Submit your music to 8tracks radio11/13/2022 ![]() SoundCloud offers users the ability to upload, share and listen to entire songs and sound recordings. As such, for many years, Grooveshark has swum in murky waters it is a safe bet that the Florida-based company will be extinct very, very soon. In September of 2014, nine record labels successfully sued Grooveshark in the United States District Court Southern District of New York, with heavy liability expected for co-founders Sam Tarantino and Joshua Greenberg. Unfortunately, this argument flies in the face of a reality that was subsequently proven in court: Grooveshark executives actually encouraged company employees to violate copyright laws in order to populate the Grooveshark music database.ĭespite reaching a licensing agreement with EMI Music Publishing in 2009 (which was terminated and then sued upon by EMI in 2012 due to non-payment of royalties), Grooveshark and its parent company Escape Media Group have at various times been sued by some combination of the four major record labels. Reliance on this provision is one of the main arguments advanced by Grooveshark in defence of the numerous lawsuits brought by labels and publishers. Because the songs on Grooveshark are uploaded from users’ private collections, there is no necessary guarantee of file quality or sound fidelity.įrom its launch in 2006, Grooveshark’s business strategy was to build a massive database of music, attract a large audience (which, according to Grooveshark, peaked at 30 million monthly users), and then obtain the necessary licences to monetize the service.Īs one of the earlier online music streaming services, it grew very quickly in fact, at one point, the ubiquity of the service caused many people to believe that it was either a) legal or b) that its use in the United States of copyrighted content fell under the “safe harbour” provision under §512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which effectively shields online service providers from liability of copyright infringement if they promptly remove infringing content upon receiving notice from the rights owner, and subject to certain other conditions (the Canadian Copyright Act contains similar safe harbour provision, though intermediaries seeking protection are not obligated to take down any allegedly infringing material). The user interface is average, and the look and feel of the service has changed several times over the years. Users can stream individual songs, listen to genre-based stations and create their own playlists. Grooveshark’s service allows users to upload music from their own collection to its online database, thereby permitting other users to stream music for “free” in exchange for exposing their eyeballs to ads. Collectively, these services represent a cross-section of the good, the bad and the ugly in the music streaming universe. Those larger issues aside, this article briefly examines six streaming services: Grooveshark, SoundCloud, 8tracks, Songza, Spotify and MediaZoic. If you have a data connection, then you have access to millions of songs on offer through online music streaming services.Ī very contentious topic in the music industry, there is much debate and discussion about issues such as royalty rates, long-term sustainability and the overall comfort with the logic of leasing music rather than owning it. To be a music fan in 2014 is, truly, to be spoiled for choice: at no time in human history has music been more available on-demand. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |